Stream On 🍿November 22, 2019
My NYU colleague professor Adam Alter has conducted research confirming that the most enduring of the senses is smell. Smell can take you back to age five, to that anxiety that sharply arose when your mother was tucking you in. Mom dousing herself in Revlon’s Charlie meant one thing, she and dad were leaving you with a stranger/babysitter. No other sense works as fast as the scent of burnt cashews will take you back to walking along Broadway, feeling inspired after seeing Cats.
Big tech has decided that original scripted television will foment enduring loyalty across platforms that sell many things. So, for the foreseeable future, the deepest pockets in the world will spend more on scripted television each year than Canada or Australia spend on defense. If Netflix continues to increase its content budget at the same rate, by 2025 Netflix will spend more on Stranger Things, You, The Crown, and other original content than the US spends on food stamps (SNAP).
Who says capitalism isn’t working?
Let’s break down the key players, their strengths and weaknesses, the winners/losers, and make some predictions. For my money the criteria are content, value, distribution (control of purchase/experience), and flywheel (ability to monetize content/loyalty across other business units).
Carpe Stream — Netflix
Netflix, the original gangster, has the largest budget and the best technology. For all the talk about AI, the only tangible way AI has changed my life is the Netflix algorithm. Those endorphins still hit when it figures out I’d like to watch episode six of House of Cards after watching episode five, in 3, 2, 1. If you want to understand someone, I mean really understand them, pull up their Netflix home screen. I’m depressed and angry, as evidenced by my love of documentaries about the crimes against humanity we’ve levied on each other (WWII in Color, Hitler: A Career).
Netflix has first-mover advantage, 159 million subscribers, access to Amazon-like cheap capital, and one of the best leadership teams in tech. Its weakness? A lack of control over their distribution and a pure-play model that has one revenue stream — no flywheel. There are few (i.e, none) firms that have grown much beyond Netflix’s $135 billion in value without control over their distribution or other ways to monetize the enduring scent of media.
At Netflix, content is the main course, and consumers, for now, think of other streaming services as side dishes. Netflix is less vulnerable to the Allied forces invading their shores in force, as it will likely hold its subscriber base in the US, and will live or die by international growth.
I believe Amazon’s $6 billion spend on original content is the most expensive hair plugs in history. Put another way, it costs a tech guy who looks like Jeff Bezos $6 billion to take his new girlfriend to the Emmys. To be fair, Fleabag may sell a sh*t-ton more paper towels. It’s another reason, which we didn’t need, to renew Prime. If the worst poker players in the world (Cuomo and De Blasio) hadn’t had their bluff called, Mr. Bezos’s midlife crisis would have cost NY taxpayers another $3 billion. But I digress.
Amazon Prime is number two in the space due to second-mover advantage and access to the cheapest capital in history. The most expensive Emmys in history have been purchased by the Seattle firm. The offering, despite its investment, has mediocre content (quantity over quality). However, the value is there, as it’s bundled with Prime.
Amazon is likely a winner in the streaming wars due to their vertical distribution, via the Fire Stick, and their ability to monetize content across the second most valuable recurring revenue bundle in business, Prime. (Microsoft Office still #1.)
HBO Max = HBO WTF
HBO changed the landscape and will go down in history as one of the greatest collisions of talent and storytelling in media history. However, HBO is now history, as it embarks on a strategy that could best be described as fu*king stupid. HBO built one of the great cultures of creativity in history. Think Disney’s animation studios in the forties, or Athens, Georgia, in the eighties (REM, B-52s), or … ok, I’m reaching, My. Damn. Blog.
Anyway, HBO does so much more… on so much less than other media players because of the secret sauce of their culture, which has continued to attract A-list talent. Junking it up with Big Bang Theory (Warner content) is to take Hermès and decide selling cargo pants is a better business. It isn’t. HBO’s value is not about more, its value is derived from offering less. Less is more … the DNA of any luxury brand.
HBO has the fewest programs of any SVOD, but the best. The green light gets lit less often at HBO, so subscribers are more inclined to try out new programs. To move to a mass strategy makes no sense. The only thing that will win at the mass level (bumping up against Amazon/Netflix) will be capital they just don’t have. I could cry, seriously cry. The biggest strategy/brand f*ckup of 2020.
This error in judgment coupled with a parent that’s the most indebted in the corporate world will lead to a write-down of AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner that is second only to Time Warner’s write-down (20 years previous) of AOL. You broke my heart, John Stankey.
HBO Max: great content going to mediocre. Weakest value proposition and good distribution (AT&T and DirecTV). A flywheel effect that hasn’t lived up to the purchase price.
The Empire Finally Strikes Back — Disney+
Pedro Pascal + Baby Yoda = genius. It’s rewarding to welcome the Mouse to the digital age. The Disney+ launch, and its glitches, validated the tech investment at Netflix. However, content does appear to be king, and 10 million sign-ups is validation that being in the business of content creation means you create better content. A flywheel that includes cruise ships, Chewbacca dolls, and a Galaxy’s Edge theme area make Disney+ the most shareholder accretive of the SVOD efforts, as evidenced by the 9% increase in DIS stock ($21 billion) the week of the launch.
Similar to Netflix, the Mouse’s achilles heel is distribution.
Because I co-host a podcast with Kara Swisher, I’m considered an influencer now and was invited to the premiere of The Morning Show. It was a great event with fabulous people watching a mediocre TV show at … Lincoln Center. Apple TV+ is exactly what you’d expect when a deep-pocketed tech firm hardware starts making TV shows. For the cost of Game of Thrones (each show is $15 million per episode), the viewer gets Murphy Brown. Actually, that’s not fair to Murphy Brown, a great show.
Distribution is off the charts with rails that run through a 1.4 billion strong neighborhood of the globally affluent. On a dollar charged per billion spent on content, Apple TV+ is the best value. Couple this with a flywheel effect that includes the most profitable product ever sold, and it was over before it started, in a good way. Apple TV+ will fail up faster than Adam Neumann.
Last mover advantage (none). Good content, good distribution … but does anybody know or care about Peacock?
Watches YouTube once …
A cool trivia question about the tens decade. Will become a sub-brand of Disney+.
The winners of the streaming wars, as defined by which platforms add the most incremental stakeholder value, will be Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, and Apple TV+. Media has now become a customer acquisition vehicle, vs. a stand-alone business. So, the firms with the most seamless means of speedballing the media crack will win. The media business is now about phones, cruises, and paper towels.
And, as is increasingly the case in our economy, big tech wins. These firms must all spend billions to raise awareness and acquire customers. Spoiler alert: the best place to acquire customers for online media is online media (Facebook and Google). In addition, Apple and Amazon are tollbooths for most/all SVOD, as the app store and Amazon (Fire Stick, Prime) tax or touch most SVOD sign-ups.
- Netflix and/or Disney acquires Roku or other distribution
- Roku and Hulu will not remain independent
- Quibi and Peacock underwhelm
- Apple and Disney add $300 billion in market cap combined by launching recurring revenue bundles, “rundles,” with media at the center.
The defense budget of Australia spent on scripted television. The American Dream is alive and well.
Life is so rich,
P.S. You can’t escape the howl of the hound. Something new on our YouTube channel — keep the feedback coming. #podcast
Привет,я Seo специалист с 7+ летним опытом работы в области seo. Превосходное портфолио. +380660012209 Viber,Telegram
Nice post. Question though … By not listing Netflix as a “winner”, are you implying they will lose their leadership position and become increasingly less relevant?
Is there a better denominator for measuring the streaming wars than #of Emmy’s ? thinking down the road that might not be significant.
Start working at home with Google! Just work for few hours and have more time with friends and family. I earn up to $4500 per week. It’s a great work at home opportunity. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out….. HERE☛☛ www.bayusd11.com
so this is the sum-up? there are other options at least for people who dont consider themselves to be sheep or consumers. for me youtube is the best option because its programmed by me. and not watched on a phone or any other minuscule device. also in 4k. always satisfies every time. so yeah, um, no. I could have bought disney+ for 140 something dollars for 3 years but passed. netflix is meh. nothing else matters. its live sports [or properly dvr’d sports] and youtube for the win. minus ads of course. best 10 bucks a month you can spend.
Hulu better be bought by someone else. Their new rate hike to $55/month makes the unthinkable, thinkable. Going to back to cable and dropping Hulu Live is not only an option, but it’s also a cost-effective option. Good-by Hulu Live
What a beautiful blog Scott. Love the humor and intelligence.
I was promised a 5 minute read…. but seriously…. HBO is playing catch up, Disney+ is a clear winner, I’m rooting for Netflix they just need to smarten up, before they’re goal was to be HBO before HBO became them. House of Mouse vs. Orange Stranger of Cards (couldn’t come up with a Netflix pub).
No thoughts on the CBS streaming service now heading into the third year?
It was useful for the Stormy Daniels interview in 60 Minutes.
Please get the podcast on a podcast app. It’s like watching radio on the TV, i.e. no one does that.
Re your first para, today I learnt from the radio (remember that?) that the astonishing geolocational powers of carrier pigeons is achieved through their use of scent gradients at least as much as vision. Sorry – carry on.
Where does live sports factor into the equation?
Seems like Disney+ is in the best position to get people to truly “cut the cord” because the only thing people are using cable for is sports, and owning ESPN could the thing that separates them from the pack. Amazon is getting their feet wet and could spend big on the next MLB NFL and NBA contracts, but I don’t think the older demographic is ever going to watch a football game on Twitch. I could see my parents wrapping their head around using their Disney app to access ESPN. NBC has skin in the sports game, but as you said, Peacock seems like a long shot to truly compete with the Mouse.
espn+ and if you like international [outside the usa] sports fubo.tv . honestly disney could nuke the planet by pulling espn off every service and either sell it standalone with espn+ or in a focused bundle with disney+ . either way that would spell the end for any competition in the non OTA world as well as the end of cable/satellite. not exactly a bad outcome
You are completely right. Content should be king but quantity is going to win. Also I fell for the ”5-min read”, haha