
The Attention Economy and Young People
Audio Recording by Written by Kyla Scanlon. As read by George Hahn. P.S. Kyla Scanlon is the author of In This Economy? How Money & Markets Really Work. After you buy her book, you should subscribe to her newsletter. https://www.profgalloway.com/the-attention-economy-and-young-people/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Economies are defined by scarcity, not abundance (scarcity = value). Today, information is abundant, attention is scarce. The scale of the world’s largest companies, the wealth of its richest people, and the power of governments are all rooted in the extraction, monetization, and custody of attention. The most recent example: American Eagle added $200 million in market cap overnight, not by increasing sales or lowering costs, but by hacking the attention economy with a Sydney Sweeney ad calibrated for the culture war’s choose-your-own-narrative ecosystem. The stock popped another 20% after President Trump praised the ad on his social media platform. Sydney Sweeney doesn’t have great jeans, or genes, but great memes.
Few people understand attention economy dynamics better than Kyla Scanlon. She captured, monetized, and continues to hold my attention on TikTok. (Where else?) She’s a frequent guest on Prof G Markets — listen here for Kyla’s American Eagle take — and the author of In This Economy? How Money & Markets Really Work. Kyla coined the term “vibecession” to explain the disconnect between the strong fundamentals and gloomy outlook of the Biden economy. This week, I asked her to write about how the attention economy affects young people.
The Attention Economy and Young People
by Kyla Scanlon
We’re all living through a time of immense change. The news cycle is whiplash-inducing, frameworks are being broken, and everything feels unmoored.
Last year on the road talking about my book, In This Economy?, I heard one common thread: worry. A generation-shaping worry. CEOs are worried about their businesses, manufacturers about tariffs, and young people about everything — from identity to employment to whether the world they’re inheriting even makes sense.
Young people today face a triple disruption: technological creative destruction through AI and algorithmic systems, plus political and economic upheaval through tariffs and increasing fiscal uncertainty. While every generation has faced challenges, today’s young people confront a massive reckoning between technology, economic opportunity, and personal identity.
Across the U.S., young people tell me the same thing: They’re worried about jobs, but more important, they question whether the concept of a “career” will even exist in five years. They’re graduating into a Great Uncertainty, where traditional pathways to security are disappearing, affecting how they think about their entire economic future — from employment to homeownership to marriage to having kids.
To understand what’s happening, we need to understand two things: the attention economy and the real economy. But let me start with a very surreal moment that crystallized everything for me.
Trumpcoin: The Defining Moment of 2025
Late Friday night, on January 17, 2025, Donald Trump launched a memecoin. By Sunday — a mere three days later! — Trump and his team had generated $60 billion in paper wealth from pure narrative value. By Monday, Inauguration Day, he was both president again and one of the world’s richest individuals, entirely through attention-based speculation. The coin officially “has nothing to do with any political campaign or office” (or so they say), but its success came precisely because it’s associated with him.
I believe this moment cemented our final step in the transition into the attention economy. The president of the United States bypassed every traditional wealth-creation mechanism and generated more money in 36 hours than most companies create in decades. All through attention and narrative.
Historically, value creation followed a clear progression:
- Capture attention with a quality product (Apple’s iPhone), then convert that attention to business improvement (reinvestment or share buybacks).
- Build better products, generating real cash flow and compounding value over time. This was the Warren Buffett playbook — attention as a means to an end, with cash flow and tangible assets at its core.
Trumpcoin skipped the middle steps entirely:
- Capture attention.
- Convert directly into value.
Attention is truly all you need. Attention became the product, the business improvement, the way to compound wealth. It worked with immense speed, because Trump controls political positioning (executive power, regulatory influence); platforms (narrative shaping via Truth Social); and now token wealth (instant value creation through pure narrative).
This was the birth of the Attention Singularity, where power, narrative, and wealth merged into one self-reinforcing system. Attention became so dense that it warped reality itself. We’re watching a system where attention directly creates wealth, wealth instantly empowers, power captures more attention, and each cycle gets faster and stronger.
Many young people watched this and thought: Of course this is how the world works now. Of course attention is the ultimate currency. Of course the old rules don’t apply. I have to change everything.
Watching this unfold made me question everything I thought I knew about value creation. (Cue the meme of someone throwing away a copy of the Intelligent Investor.) But it also made me realize we needed to look at the broader ecosystem that made Trumpcoin possible in the first place, because this was the logical conclusion of the system we’ve built.
The New Rules
Four interconnected elements have reshaped our reality:
- Digital Infrastructure: Our mass communication system is privatized and optimized for profit. Billionaires own newspapers, platforms, and the very means of connection. Communication has become an addiction because it has to be! That’s how the big bucks are made.
- The Algorithm Trap: We’ve built our communication infrastructure around engagement metrics rather than knowledge. Attention game winners excel at capturing eyeballs (Mr. Beast, Sydney Sweeney, Joe Rogan, etc.), but aggregated attention rarely equates to societal progress.
- Brainrot: Short-form video has totally changed how we process information. Instead of reading or having deep conversations, we absorb fragments and regurgitate talking points. We’ve drastically lowered our standards for what constitutes being informed.
- The Generation Gap: Among U.S. adults younger than 30, 59% use TikTok. To succeed in business, you must master digital media. Many people now work in social media or marketing — an extremely valuable skill set, but one that’s also frying our brains.
These four elements reinforce one another, forming a digital cage. When narrative production becomes more valuable than actual production, we risk creating a world where attention harvesting matters more than building things. Hence, Trumpcoin.
But young people aren’t just passive victims of this system. They’re responding to it, and their responses are reshaping politics.
The Politics of Disruption
When things are uncertain, people retreat to extremes but also vote for “new normals.” Trump won in 2024 partly by capturing young voters who believed traditional professional paths promising stability might cease to exist soon. Coupled with increased zero-sum thinking, institutional distrust, and attention economy dynamics, young people are trying to find footing in a fundamentally new world.The conservative shift among young voters is about more than politics. When OpenAI’s Sam Altman says AI will require the “whole structure of society to be up for debate and reconfiguration,” the entire nature of the self is being questioned.
Economic Headwinds
The boomer generation, born between 1946 and 1964, had a somewhat clearish wealth-building formula (broad generalization) and a (seemingly) clearer sense of self:
- Career progression + home appreciation + retirement savings, supported by mostly predictable returns on education.
This shaped their worldview and understanding of success. Boomers are the wealthiest generation to have ever lived, thanks to affordable housing and strong equity markets.
The boomer formula worked for many despite disruptions like the stagflation of the 1970s and the mega-high interest rates of the 1980s. But many boomers who benefited from this system have participated in its dismantling through thousands of small decisions prioritizing short-term gains over systemic stability.
Today, boomers own 38% of homes nationwide, despite comprising just over 20% of the population. Millennials haven’t caught up to boomer life markers and homeownership rates. Homeownership rates are even lower for Gen Z than Millennials at the same ages, according to a UC Berkeley study. Meanwhile, 72.9% of wealth is held by people over 55. Millennials and Gen Z own 71% less wealth than their population representation would predict, according to the St. Louis Federal Reserve.
Young People’s Response: The Barbell Strategy
These conditions create a situation that resembles Nassim Taleb’s Barbell Strategy. We increasingly have a world split between young people 1) forgoing college to pursue the trades or 2) gambling everything on digital moon shots.
Taleb writes that the barbell strategy is a “method that consists of taking both a defensive attitude and an excessively aggressive one at the same time.” Here, we see people doing maybe one or the other. The barbell economy creates its own culture:
- Safety seekers: Those skipping college debt to pursue trades, finding identity in stability amid chaos. The toolbelt generation is choosing steady work over uncertain professional paths.
- Digital gamblers: Those embracing the creator economy, crypto speculation, and AI startup moon shots. Finding identity in potential rather than stability.
To be clear, a middle path still exists and is evolving. I’m generalizing to make a point. Many people are still going down the traditional road — and rightly so! — albeit with more skepticism. For some, it’s working, especially for those entering healthcare and social services, the only sectors adding jobs currently. Others are trying to bridge the gap between the past and the present with mixed results.
But as my former professor Dr. Indudeep Chhachhi says, “The opposite of rationality isn’t irrationality — it’s being normal.” When the “safe path” might be eliminated by AI overnight, hypergambling becomes emotionally and economically sensible. Safety seekers are making calculated bets. Digital gamblers are responding to an economy that increasingly rewards exponential outcomes.
Two Paths Forward
I see two possible paths, both requiring us to acknowledge how the game has changed:
- Path One: Platform Reboot. Build platforms optimized for understanding rather than engagement. Create digital spaces that strengthen society rather than fragment it. Develop algorithms that reward depth and critical thinking instead of emotional manipulation. It’s a lot. Is it possible? I’m not sure. But we certainly have to try something new.
- Path Two: Navigation. Teach digital literacy — beyond privacy settings — to understand attention dynamics. Create systems to preserve digital culture independent of any single platform.
There are policy choices here around technology regulation, wealth transfer mechanisms, platform governance. But spending this year talking to young people across America has convinced me that the deeper challenge isn’t just technical or policy-driven. It’s about something more important: our collective capacity to understand one another across the attention economy’s fault lines.
Young people aren’t broken. They’re adapting to a world that’s fundamentally different from the one their parents knew. But their parents aren’t wrong either for feeling like the ground has shifted beneath their feet. The attention economy has created new forms of value and new pathways to wealth. The old ways of understanding ourselves and one another are straining to keep up.
The attention economy isn’t going anywhere. It’s too powerful, too integrated into how value gets created now. It’s a system, though, and systems can be changed. As historian Howard Zinn wrote: “If we remember those times and places — and there are so many — where people have behaved magnificently, this gives us the energy to act, and at least the possibility of sending this spinning top of a world in a different direction. And if we do act, in however small a way, we don’t have to wait for some grand utopian future. The future is an infinite succession of presents, and to live now as we think human beings should live, in defiance of all that is bad around us, is itself a marvelous victory.”
_______
P.S. Kyla Scanlon is the author of In This Economy? How Money & Markets Really Work. After you buy her book, you should subscribe to her newsletter.
20 Comments
Need more Scott in your life?
The Prof G Markets Pod now has a newsletter edition. Sign up here to receive it every Monday. What a thrill.
Scott’s TDS is back. The issue is today’s young people are the most coddled generation in history. What many need: Marines, Army, Navy, Coast Guard, Air Force. You used to say national service should be required, but you skipped the armed forces when talking with Heather Cox Richardson. Most can’t communicate—hiring managers tell me they’re embarrassed to put them in front of final interviewers. Few have picked up a shovel, gone hunting, fishing, or built/fixed anything not called an iPhone or Starbucks mug. Scott, I know you’re an atheist and believe in an eternity of blackness, motivating you to wring every second from your final decades (as you said in your NYT piece). Maybe young people could take a lesson from the Apostle Paul: “aspire to live quietly…work with your hands…be dependent on no one.” In today’s terms: there are plenty of good construction jobs. But the young people you interact with want to define and control everything in their little worlds. Life doesn’t work like that. The sooner they learn, the better.
Excellent. A broad mind to the science, philosophy, and theology of
Human evolution is also -and perhaps more so – a key to an insight into that which we now find ourselves. Pierre Teilhard Jardin, Julian Huxley, and others offer a direction that is “modernity proof”.
Scott- Every generation has these worries and concerns. You sound like your parents. Yes, there is more uncertainty today because change has never occurred so quickly. On the other hand, there has never been so much opportunity for wealth creation. In other words- there is a natural balance here. The outcome is likely to result in higher real levels of median incomes and aggregate wealth and greater income and wealth disparity. That’s a feature of great opportunity, not a defect as you imply.
BTW- Higher growth rates and the corresponding increase in equity values result in great wealth through compounding. Naturally the greatest increase in wealth from compounding occurs in the later years which naturally explains the greater disparity of wealth of the different generations. It’s just math, nothing sinister.
Spot on.
Exactly!!!
Cogent piece of work. We have a sui generis President in Trump, at a time of manical content in the digital world. We are lucky that there are so many bright young minds around the world and I do hope that they right this ship.
Capitalism is great at giving us what we want but usually horrible at giving us what we need. The caveman/cavewomen in us needs at least one intimate relationship and stability to create a family. Many men go for the “moonshot” because many women only want the most financially secure men that make more than they do. The frequent economic shocks and ability to see what is (theoretically) possible around the world has made young people frustrated and angry. They spend so much time on curated entertainment (movies and social media) that they have lost touch with reality in many ways. Until people, especially young people, can get their basic social needs met then everything else is going to be a distraction. Many are already trying to escape the online insanity by moving overseas, starting a farm, being a prepper, etc. The US is already a dystopian society that makes Mad Max seem closer than ever.
Kyla never misses. Great end quote from Zinn as well.
Exceptional writing, analysis and insight.
“Attention directly creates value”. An intriguing observation but the article does not describe how this actually works, there’s no description of the mechanism of attention creating value. Without understanding the mechanism I’m left wondering if the Attention Economy is anything more than more intense, more gripping advertising? Marketing on steroids? Skillful and entertaining pitches have always been able to attract attention and convince people to part with their money. Is promoting Trumpcoin that different from a huckster’s selling shares of an non-existent company who is actually selling the pitch? More broadly, it seems to me that the market has always had a disconnect with real value. The market can get people to pay what it will bear regardless of any inherent value of the item. Fine art is an example. Millions for a painting but beyond a wall decoration what is its inherent value? Beauty? Maybe for some and then it’s very subjective. I can see that The Attention Economy does fit, as an aspect of, our modern “reality is the production presented to us” reality. The value of the article for me is it directs my attention to this phenomenon, one of which it is important for me to be aware .
Here’s my question – can a retailer that ultimate has to sell some jeans at some point consider a momentary share price bump “success”? Sure, you’ve pleased Wall Street for a minute, but isn’t the pursuit of long-term consumer loyalty the thing?
Also – Trump’s tweet was that the jeans are “flying off the shelves” yet another bold faced lie from our convicted criminal of a president. I know he lies so much it’s gotten boring to point it out every time he does, but in this case I think it is important to point out that he manipulated the market by lying to the American people. Is that legal for a president to do or….
While as far as it goes, this commentary rings as valid, I am increasingly distressed by two things (applies to “Pivot” podcast as well): very little integration of the forecasted reality (actuaries, scientists, and others) associated with the GHG emissions from our fossil fuel economy; and excessive faith in The Economy which, while it might be the foundational building block of global commerce to date, delivered us to this point where we humanity lemmings are sprinting towards the climate cliffs with seemingly no real appreciation for the disasters that await, including destruction of that same Economy.
Wall Street, Bay Street (Canada), etc. have no interest in change because it means profit/wealth losses, but that does not make it any less inevitable without a 180 degree pivot (pun intended).
Please give this real consideration in your written pieces and in the podcast going forward. It really constitutes THE challenge for our children and their children(?). We (I am 67) have delivered them to this point: it is on us.
Late-stage capitalism maps well to the game of musical chairs. Both get progressively more and more frantic towards the end.
Historically, no economic system lasts forever — feudalism, mercantilism, early industrial capitalism all gave way to something else. What comes after late-stage capitalism depends on whether societies choose reform, replacement, or simply run into a wall and rebuild from the rubble.
As long as there are almost enough chairs to sit on and the music continues playing, society as a whole won’t consciously choose what comes next. It wasn’t until sometime after mid-November 1929 that people in power decided to rebuild the crashed system with a measure of social democracy, safety nets, and common-sense security/stability measures. Now that we are in the most frantic stage of the game, again, well funded elite players are positioning themselves to have a seat in one dystopian future or another, or to stay on top for as long as piecemeal patching can keep the system running.
The 1970’s had a similar vibe; and here we are. Capitalism can be messy, but has an innate ability to change course. I wonder how many in the Democratic bureaucracy are seeing this.
I became too depressed to finish this post. Great post. Wish I were stronger.
We are entering the post US era!
too much hubris, too much generalized ignorance & corruption brings down the whole house of cards!
Maybe just as well!🤔
An insightful article. I recognise ‘the digital cage’ – and what a great metaphor it is.
There are people out there trying to build platforms that are less rapacious (like kagi.com) but they get squished by the big bucks.
Much to ponder, thank you Mr. Galloway and Ms Scanlon.
As is usual. Totally skipped any mention of Gen X and what they have experienced.
Kyla Scanlon is a 27 year old hipster with an undergraduate education from a no-name school who is herself a bit of a financial wunderkind. She has as much credibility on the big picture financial matters as Fifty Cent.
The attention span hypothesis has a few more months before everybody loses their interest and the attention dwindles.
JLM
Thank you for introducing Kyla Scanlon. I checked a few things. I noticed that when selling cars during her internship, she was shocked to find economic illiteracy among Americans. My observations indicate the same illiteracy in politics, technology, and health.
I am old. Just recently attended the 50th anniversary of my college graduation ceremony. But for God’s sake, I learned the message of this article in my high school in Poland, at that time a backward country. Obviously, my teachers did not use the terms or charts as in this article. They taught us the basic skills a person needs to survive in modern society. Still, it works well for me, and other people from my generation who ended up in the U.S., as well as for my college buddies, whom I met during the recent reunion.
PS. I bought Ms. Scanlon’s book.